Builder Promises – How much are they worth when signing new condominium agreements?
Condominium buyers have launched a class action lawsuit against Emerald City Developments for a building at 70 Forest Manor Drive in north Toronto. The suit has been launched because the building does not having direct access to the Sheppard/Don Mills sub way station and some buyers bought a unit based on the belief that it would be.
The courts will have to decide whether this was an actual promise and if so whether buyers are entitled to a reduced price for their units.
Here are the issues:
One of the items in the 2008 purchase and sale agreement says that the building’s features include a “Lower lobby with direct access to the subway station.” This was also apparently promoted in marketing materials at the time.
When owners started moving into their units – this January, the building did not have direct access to the subway from the lower lobby. Owners must leave the building to get to the subway which is nearby. One buyer said that having direct access was important to him for safety reasons for his daughter to travel to the University of Toronto.
The original contract also contained the usual developer’s clause that says the builder can change plans and specifications of the building at its sole discretion, or as required by any government. This is as long as it is not a material change, including any changes advertised in any sales brochure.
In law, a material change is one that would cause someone to change their mind and not buy a property. If the developer makes a material change, they are obligated to give buyers 10 days to cancel the contract, even if the change occurs years after the original contract was signed. The builder appears to be taking the position that since it will be relatively few steps from the building to access the subway, this was not a material change and does not merit any reduction in the price paid.
I spoke with Toronto lawyer and condominium expert Harry Herskowitz, who reminded me that in the recent case involving the Trump condominium building, one of the arguments that was raised by the owners who wanted out of the deal was that it was promised by the developer that the Trump building would connect to the underground PATH system in Toronto. Didn’t happen. The buyers said that this was a material change which should permit them to cancel their deals. In the decision of Judge J.R. Mackinnon, dated April 25, 2013, he stated that even though he was troubled by the failure to complete the PATH system, he said that it was not a material change, primarily because expert evidence was introduced by the builder that since most of the buyers in the Trump building were investors, the failure to have the connection to the PATH would not have been material to them. This judgement was confirmed at the Court of Appeal on February 24, 2014.
In my opinion, the ability to go downtown to work without a raincoat, by having direct access to a subway, would be an important consideration for most buyers. We will have to wait and see how this case turns out.
When you buy a pre-construction condominium, you have 10 days to change your mind. Use the time to go to a lawyer to review your agreement so you understand what all the clauses really mean. You must also be aware that you may not receive exactly what the builder promises, as the builder can still make changes to your square footage, the layout of your unit and the finishings, as long as these are not material, and you cannot complain. This is why it is important to check the reputation of the builder.
Questions to ask re Builder Promises
Go to other buildings they have completed and ask the owners the following questions:
- Did they build what was promised?
- Did they finish on time?
- Did they correct any deficiencies in a timely manner?
Do proper research before you buy and you should not be disappointed.
By: M. Weislander